A
recent study (Skerrett et al, 2014)
found that LGBT suicides are more likely to be associated with relationship
problems rather than familial conflict when compared to non-LGBT cases. Some
commentators have interpreted this as evidence that worse health outcomes among
LGBT people are caused by problems inherent to the nature of LGBT
relationships, rather than by societal discrimination. Such presumption is
untenable. Confounders in this finding include selection bias and reporting
bias.
The
study identified 35 LGBT cases among 5966 suicides recorded in the Queensland
Suicide Register (QSR). Previous studies have found that 2.6% of men and 2.3%
of women in Australia identify as homosexual or bisexual (Smith
et al, 2003), and that people in same-sex relationships are greatly
overrepresented among suicide cases (Mathy et al, 2011). Based on these figures,
one would expect well in excess of 137 LGBT cases in the QSR. The methodology
used in the Skerrett study grossly under-identifies LGBT cases while
disproportionately selecting for LGBT people who live away from their
biological families. People may be expected to experience less familial
conflict if they live away from their families.
The QSR
data is generated chiefly from police interviews with next of kin. While a
domestic partner normally takes precedence, this rule may not have been
followed in LGBT cases because Queensland law did not consistently recognise
same-sex partners as next of kin during most of the study period. This
introduces further potential bias in the attribution of factors associated with
the LGBT suicides.
A basic
principle of scientific evidence is that observations can only be interpreted
within the context of the observer. Findings in variables where confounders are
not controlled for do not constitute valid evidence, but at most can only raise
further questions that require further appropriately designed study to explore.
References:
No comments:
Post a Comment