Monday, 28 October 2013

Zoe's law

Wei Hong commented on ST’s link:
The Sydney Morning Herald
17 October 2013
Decriminalising abortion in NSW will be harder if controversial changes to the Crimes Act, known as Zoe's law, are passed, critics say.

Unlawful foetal loss is already covered under the definition of “grievous bodily harm,” which attracts a comparable penalty to the “Zoe's Law version 2” bill. Therefore, the proposed law serves no significant practical effect other than to advance a pro-life ideology.

(It is also interesting that Ms Donegan is campaigning for recognition of legal personhood for foetuses beyond 20 weeks gestation yet also identifies as being pro-choice. The potential discordance here can be rationalised by affirming Judith Jarvish Thomson’s “violinist” argument.)

No comments:

Post a Comment